Justice Department investigating the NFL over subscription fee concerns, source says
WASHINGTON — The Justice Department has opened an investigation into whether the NFL is forcing football fans to pay too much in subscription fees, according to a person familiar with the investigation.
Subscribe to read this story ad-free
Get unlimited access to ad-free articles and exclusive content.
In years past, football fans watched NFL games over broadcast TV, delivered free into their homes. The 1961 Sports Broadcasting Act allowed for sports leagues to get around some antitrust concerns and negotiate media rights. But now, games are spread across many different platforms and channels, and some require paid subscriptions to access.
The Justice Department investigation is into antitrust and anticompetitive tactics, the person said. It comes after Sen. Mike Lee, R-Utah, the chairman of the Senate Subcommittee on Antitrust, Competition Policy and Consumer Rights, wrote a letter last month requesting a review of the NFL’s streaming platform exemptions and wanted to know whether the streaming package fees violated the Sports Broadcasting act.
The Justice Department didn’t comment. The White House referred questions back to the Justice Department. The NFL didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment. The Wall Street Journal first reported the investigation.
“To watch every NFL game during the past season, football fans spent almost $1,000 on cable and streaming subscriptions,” Lee wrote in his letter.
The NFL said in a statement in February, according to The Associated Press, that 87% of its games are shown on free broadcast television, in addition to digital platforms.
“The NFL has the most accessible, fan-friendly distribution model across all of sports and entertainment,” according to the statement.
Following Lee’s letter, the Federal Communications Commission said it was seeking public responses about how viewing habits have changed across the modern landscape that depends increasingly on streaming services.
“The packaging of individual teams’ television rights was thought to be necessary to enhance the financial stability of the leagues by assuring equal distribution of revenues among all teams,” according to the FCC letter.
Commissioners wanted to know whether the current marketplace benefits or harms consumers, and the fragmented media landscape facilitates or restricts the ability of traditional media to broadcast work in the public interest, including in local news and reporting.
You may be interested

Kansas Gov. Signs Law Prohibiting “DEI-CRT” in Gen Ed
new admin - Apr 14, 2026[ad_1] The bill was signed into law last week. Photo illustration by Justin Morrison/Inside Higher Ed | Liudmila Chernetska and…

Los Angeles schools strike averted as deal reached; schools are open Tuesday
new admin - Apr 14, 2026A Los Angeles Unified School District strike has been avoided and schools are open Tuesday after the district and the…

WNBA Draft: Azzi Fudd earns $500K rookie salary as Dallas Wings’ top pick
new admin - Apr 14, 2026[ad_1] NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles! Azzi Fudd is reuniting with her old UConn Huskies teammate, Paige…






























