Student Demand Outpaces Campus Counseling Availability

Amid ongoing student mental health challenges, demand for support continues to climb nationwide while campus counseling centers struggle to adapt under the mounting strain. A new report from TimelyCare finds that counseling and psychological services (CAPS) leaders face persistent staffing, budget and access constraints as they rework care-delivery models to meet student needs.

The report, based on survey research from more than 130 CAPS leaders nationwide, found that roughly 80 percent of respondents reported staff-to-student ratios of one to 500 or higher, and nearly half reported ratios of one to 1,000 or higher. While those fall within the ranges recommended by the International Accreditation of Counseling Services, burnout is adding to existing staffing pressures.

Some 38 percent of counseling centers reported losing counselors to burnout within the past year or two, yet only about 23 percent said they had succeeded in reducing caseloads in response.

“Many schools haven’t been able to adjust provider caseloads even as demand continues to rise,” said Seli Fakorzi, director of mental health services and client liaison at TimelyCare. “With limited time and resources, there hasn’t been much flexibility to reduce those workloads or adapt capacity to meet student needs.”

Fakorzi said student mental health needs are upending the traditional campus counseling model built around scheduled, in-person appointments, with serious consequences for learners.

“Clinician burnout is a student success issue,” Fakorzi said. “When care teams are stretched beyond their capacity, access and continuity become fragile for students, too.”

These challenges come amid growing demand for student mental health support: 86 percent of the CAPS leaders surveyed said needs are increasing, including about half who reported a significant increase.

“[CAPS] leaders are trying to expand access, protect staff well-being, reach diverse student populations and prove whether support is actually improving student outcomes,” Fakorzi said. “That points to a need for a brand-new playbook centered on hybrid care, stronger integration, measurement-based outcomes and more sustainable staffing models. But many campuses are overwhelmed trying to tackle all of those priorities at once.”

Key findings: Wait times for counseling services varied by institution, with about 40 percent of CAPS leaders noting students typically wait fewer than three days for care, while 33 percent reported wait times of up to seven days.

After-hours access also remained uneven: About 28 percent of institutions rely on on-call staff only for emergencies, while 37 percent partner with a virtual care provider to expand coverage.

“Wait times have increased—not only for scheduled appointments, but also for the on-demand services campuses are able to provide,” Fakorzi said. “That makes the system more fragile, and even a single staff absence, campus incident or spike in crisis demand can push wait times even higher.”

The report found that 63 percent of CAPS leaders believe their offices are successfully serving diverse student populations, while 37 percent said they are not meeting those needs effectively.

Fakorzi noted that any growth in support services needs to be paired with effective communication and outreach to students who might not naturally seek out campus counseling services, including male and LGBTQ+ students.

Nearly 59 percent of institutions already partner with a virtual mental health provider, and about 90 percent of their CAPS leaders said virtual care supplements on-campus counseling staff.

“Virtual care should be seen as part of the infrastructure that complements the counseling center, not a replacement for it,” Fakorzi said. “The strongest models extend coverage, create more pathways into care, support after-hours access and help match students with providers who fit their needs.”

However, Fakorzi said, the quality of those partnerships depends on strong communication, coordinated handoffs and transparent outcomes data.

“We want counseling center directors and campus leaders to understand exactly what they’re getting, so it’s not simply, ‘Here’s a virtual service,’ but also the impact it’s having on students,” she said.

Rethinking counseling models: Fakorzi said institutions that may not have the budget to significantly expand counseling staff can adopt strategies to better support students without overwhelming existing teams—including by placing clinicians in different areas of campus to support residential life and multicultural student communities.

“I’ve heard a great deal more about programming around group sessions and mental health–focused events on campus,” Fakorzi said. “There are also therapeutic elements being integrated into campus activities, which not only help attract more students to the counseling center, but also provide more creative forms of support and services that institutions haven’t had to rely on in the past.”

Fakorzi said campus counseling centers remain at the forefront of strategizing about how to handle this increase, even as they feel the constraints of what it looks like in practice.

“The encouraging part is that many centers are not just standing still—they are actively redesigning what care looks like through hybrid models, step-care models, stronger data-informed decision-making and intentional partnerships in general,” she said. “And I think that’s been an encouraging message from the report.”

Get more content like this directly to your inbox. Subscribe here.