MIT best for interdisciplinary science

November 21, 2024
2,081 Views

U.S. higher education institutions lead the world in interdisciplinary science, according to a new ranking of interdisciplinary strength in undergraduate and postgraduate education programs and research centers. 

The Massachusetts Institute of Technology tops the Times Higher Education Interdisciplinary Science Rankings 2025, followed by Stanford University. The California Institute of Technology, Duke University and the University of Minnesota all make the top 10 in fourth, fifth and sixth place, respectively. (Times Higher Education is Inside Higher Ed’s parent company).

The University of California, Santa Barbara, is eighth and the University of Michigan at Ann Arbor takes the 10th spot. 

Rounding out the top 10 is the National University of Singapore in third place, Wageningen University & Research in the Netherlands in seventh, and Nanyang Technological University, also in Singapore, in ninth position.

The U.S. is the most represented nation among the top 100 universities, with 16 colleges.

The ISR was created in association with the Schmidt Science Fellows, an initiative of Schmidt Sciences, delivered in partnership with the Rhodes Trust, to recognize and incentivize interdisciplinary science. 

“To answer the world’s toughest questions—whether it’s scaling fusion energy or advancing quantum computing—we need to think differently,” Eric Schmidt, co-founder of Schmidt Sciences, said in a press release. 

“The Interdisciplinary Science Rankings recognizes universities that are advancing the practice of science for the next century and beyond through new institutions, emerging technologies, and effective teaching.”

The ISR measures universities based on three weighted pillars, each representing a stage in the life cycle of a research project: inputs, process and outputs. Each pillar is further divided into metrics that measure different aspects of that stage. 

The inputs pillar, for example, accounts for 19 percent of an institution’s overall scoring and is made up of its interdisciplinary science research funding and industry funding. The outputs pillar has the greatest weighting, 65 percent, and is comprised of the quality of interdisciplinary science research and an institution’s global reputation, among other metrics.

More information about the ISR methodology is available on the THE website



Source by [author_name]

You may be interested

Russia spokeswoman told not to comment on ballistic missile
World
shares2,984 views
World
shares2,984 views

Russia spokeswoman told not to comment on ballistic missile

new admin - Nov 21, 2024

IE 11 is not supported. For an optimal experience visit our site on another browser.Now PlayingWatch: Call tells Russian spokeswoman…

Ways to stay warm without heating on as Met Office issues snow warning
Lifestyle
shares3,327 views
Lifestyle
shares3,327 views

Ways to stay warm without heating on as Met Office issues snow warning

new admin - Nov 21, 2024

This article contains affiliate links, we will receive a commission on any sales we generate from it. Learn more Many…

Bob Dylan biopic first reactions for Timothée Chalamet’s A Complete Unknown film | Films | Entertainment
Movies
shares2,826 views
Movies
shares2,826 views

Bob Dylan biopic first reactions for Timothée Chalamet’s A Complete Unknown film | Films | Entertainment

new admin - Nov 21, 2024

Bob Dylan is still touring at 83 (Express.co.uk reviewed him at the Royal Albert Hall last week) but that doesn’t…