Man refused to give ‘frazzled’ mum seat on train – but people agree
A man was left feeling guilty after he refused to give up his seat on a packed train to a “frazzled” mum and her two young children.
Demonstrating appropriate train etiquette can be a minefield. While most trains have ‘priority’ seats intended for pregnant, elderly or disabled people, one 28-year-old commuter found himself in hot water with a tired mother for occupying a solo seat by the door, which wasn’t actually a priority seat.
The man, who commutes home from work each day on a crowded train, described getting a seat as “a small miracle”.
After an “especially exhausting day”, he managed to secure a seat and “planned to zone out for the 40-minute ride home”. Sharing his story on Reddit‘s AITA forum, he said: “A few stops later, a woman (mid-30s) got on with two small kids, maybe 4 and 6. She looked frazzled and was balancing bags while trying to keep the kids calm. The train was standing-room only.
“She glanced at me, clearly expecting me to offer my seat. I hesitated, but I was so drained I didn’t move. I wasn’t rude – I just looked out the window and avoided eye contact.”
A few minutes later, she “loudly” declared “some people have no manners these days”. Eventually, a man further down the carriage offered her his seat, and “she made a big show of thanking him while glaring at” the 28-year-old.
The man “felt awful” but also frustrated by the interaction. He continued: “I work long hours, and I rarely ask for anything. Is it wrong to prioritise my own exhaustion over someone else’s needs? I wasn’t in her shoes, but it’s not like I made her bring her kids on a packed train.
“My girlfriend thinks I should have given up my seat, saying, ‘it’s just basic decency.’ But my best friend says I wasn’t obligated and that being tired is a valid reason to stay seated.”
People shared their thoughts in the comments section. One said: “Would it have been kind to offer your seat? Sure, but the same goes for most every other seated passenger. Why single you out specifically? Regardless, it’s a kindness, not obligatory.
“If she’d been disabled or elderly, it’d be a different story, especially if that seat near the door happened to be one reserved for disabled/senior citizens, but a parent with kids doesn’t get priority here. I wouldn’t say you were the a**hole either way, but her singling you out with her passive aggressive nonsense definitely makes her one.”
Another surmised: “Far as I’m aware priority seats aren’t for women and kids so she’s no more right to a seat than you.”
Yet another was quick to express a different viewpoint, arguing: “A frazzled woman with two children in tow compared to a healthy young guy who worked hard but has no bags to balance, no children in tow? I agree with your girlfriend that it would have been the quality thing to do.”
You may be interested
Israeli airstrikes hit Gaza and Yemen airport where WHO chief was about to board plane
new admin - Dec 26, 2024The Israeli military said airstrikes in Yemen on Thursday targeted the Houthi rebel-held capital of Sanaa and the port city…
A weird Windows 11 bug won’t let some people install any security updates
new admin - Dec 26, 2024When using media to install Windows 11, version 24H2, the device might remain in a state where it cannot accept…
36% of Americans took on holiday debt this year — averaging $1,181 — survey finds. These tips can help
new admin - Dec 26, 2024[ad_1] Many Americans are capping off the holidays with new debt balances.This season, 36% of American consumers took on holiday debt,…