Paramount Skydance agrees to halt Warner Bros. merger until next June

Paramount Skydance has agreed to freeze its merger with rival Hollywood studio Warner Bros. Discovery until next June while a federal judge weighs an antitrust lawsuit from a coalition of state attorneys general who sued to block the $110 billion transaction.

Subscribe to read this story ad-free

Get unlimited access to ad-free articles and exclusive content.

In an 11-page court filing Friday, Paramount said it would not move forward with the tie-up until June 1, 2027, unless a federal judge issues a ruling on the suit filed by a dozen Democratic state attorneys general before then.

The agreement lengthens a temporary pause ordered this week by Judge Araceli Martínez-Olguín of the the Northern District of California.

The combination of the two companies would create a modern media colossus. It would unite two historic film studios (Paramount Pictures and Warner Bros. Pictures), two popular streaming platforms (Paramount+ and HBO Max) and two leading news organizations (CBS News and CNN).

The plaintiffs, led by California Attorney General Rob Bonta, sued to block the merger July 13, arguing in a 38-page complaint that it would “extinguish competition” in Hollywood.

“The unlawful merger of these two entertainment behemoths would lead to higher prices, lower quality, and less content for film and television, harming movie theaters, basic cable distributors, and ultimately, audiences on every sofa and movie theater seat in the U.S.,” Bonta said.

Bonta and his fellow Democratic attorneys general contend that the transaction violates Section 7 of the Clayton Antitrust Act of 1914, a federal law that bars mergers likely to substantially lessen competition.

The states argue the deal would reduce competition in three areas: wide-release theatrical film distribution, anticipated top-grossing movie distribution and the market for distributing basic cable channels to cable and satellite providers.

Paramount has rejected those claims, arguing that the states’ suit is “wrong on both the facts and the law” and “one of the weakest merger challenges in modern antitrust history.”

In a statement Friday afternoon, a Paramount spokesperson touted the merger pause as a a significant win because the result is exactly what we have sought from the outset: a direct path to a trial based on the evidence.

“This is the fastest and clearest way to prove that this transaction is good for competition, good for consumers, and good for creators, a conclusion dozens of competition authorities around the world have already reached,” the spokesperson said, later adding: “We look forward to proving our case at trial.”

The company has already received regulatory clearance from the Justice Department, and it has touted similar approvals from other countries, including Australia and China.

California’s Bonta was joined by the attorneys general of Arizona, Colorado, Connecticut, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York and Oregon.

“From the workers and artists who bring stories to life to the families who buy tickets at the box office, Paramount’s illegal takeover of Warner Bros. is a bad deal for all those who count on a competitive entertainment industry,” New York Attorney General Letitia James said in a statement.

“Halting this merger while our case proceeds is a critical victory in our efforts to uphold the law and protect the film and television industries. I look forward to continuing our case to stop this illegal merger.”