Lab Fees and Sticker Shock

Below, a dramatic adaptation of a recent conversation about a proposed increase in some lab fees.

“That seems like a big increase!”

Yes, it does. The consumables used in some programs have become much more expensive over the years since we last set lab fees.

“Would students have to pay more than one at a time?”

Probably. Depending on where they are in the program, they may be taking two lab classes in the same semester.

“Is it covered by financial aid?”

The word “covered” is doing a lot of work there, but yes, it would be included in the allowable expenses for total cost of attendance.

“Why did they go up so much?”

Because the rest of the world doesn’t care that our public funding is flat or declining. Materials cost what they cost. We don’t get a good-deeds discount.

“Couldn’t we just fold it into tuition?”

Yes, we could. If we did that, we’d basically be forcing the business and liberal arts majors to subsidize the welding and nursing majors even more than they do now. It’s an option, but we need to be clear on what it means. And then we’d catch flak over tuition increases.

“Wait, business majors subsidize welding majors? How?”

Class size. Disciplines that can handle 25 or 30 students in a section help cover the cost of disciplines that can only handle 10 or 12.

“Couldn’t we rely on philanthropy to cover the cost of materials?”

Theoretically, yes, but donors typically don’t like to cover ongoing operational costs. They see those as costs of doing business. They’re usually more comfortable supporting either capital investments or scholarships than operations. I’d be happy to be proven wrong on that, but the historical track record is pretty clear.

“Couldn’t we tighten our belts?”

What, exactly, do you think we’ve been doing for the last 15 years? Welding requires metal. It just does.

“Is there a better way?”

Absolutely. But it involves political choices different from the ones in fashion these days.

(Sigh)

Yeah. It’s the least bad option we have for now.